Pathway to Spirit
7 Princicpal of Spiritualism

Clairvoyance South London

Wimbledon - Kingston Upon Thames - Bermondsey - Clapham - Eltham - Lewisham - Woolwich - Blackheath - Southwark - New Cross And Dulwich -

News on Physical Mediumship in your area.

Pathway to Spirit via Joan Hughes is committed to promoting physical mediumship.  Over the coming months we intend to expand the website to include articles on physical mediums some well known for example and other mediums less well know.

These county pages will be devoted to local groups where physical mediumship is of interest and also provide a place for publication of physical circle activity.

Please feel free to send us an update from you circle's activities and let us have any news or articles you think relevant to physical mediumship.  Contact Joan Hughes for advice on sitting in physical circles.

Notice Board for this Area

Nothing to post for this area as yet.  In the meantime here is an extract from one of my favorite books "The Power of Now".

But if you call some emotions negative aren't you really saying that they shouldn't be there that it's not okay to have those emotions? My understanding is that we should give ourselves permission to have whatever feelings come up rather than judge them as bad or say that we shouldn't have them. It's okay to feel resentful; it's okay to be angry irritated moody or whatever - otherwise we get into repression inner conflict or denial. Everything is okay as it is.

Of course. Once a mind pattern an emotion or a reaction is there accept it. You were not conscious enough to have a choice in the matter. That's not a judgment just a fact. If you had a choice or realized that you do have a choice would you choose suffering or joy ease or unease peace or conflict? Would you choose a thought or feeling that cuts you off from your natural state of well-being the joy of life within? Any such feeling 1 call negative which simply means bad. Not in the sense that "You shouldn't have done that" but just plain factual bad like feeling sick in the stomach.

How is it possible that humans killed in excess of 100 million fellow humans in the twentieth century alone? Humans inflicting pain of such magnitude on one another is beyond anything you can imagine. And that's not taking into account the mental emotional and physical violence the torture pain and cruelty they continue to inflict on each other as well as on other sentient beings on a daily basis. Do they act in this way because they are in touch with their natural state the joy of life within? Of course not. Only people who are in a deeply negative state who feel very bad indeed would create such a reality as a reflection of how they feel. Now they are engaged in destroying nature and the planet that sustains them. Unbelievable but true. Humans are a dangerously insane and very sick species. That's not a judgment. Ifs a fact. It is also a fact that the sanity is there underneath the madness. Healing and redemption are available right now. Coming back specifically to what you said - it is certainly true that when you accept your resentment moodiness anger and so on you are no longer forced to act them out blindly and you are less likely to project them onto others. But I wonder if you are not deceiving yourself. When you have been practicing acceptance for a while as you have there comes a point when you need to go on to the next stage where those negative emotions are not created anymore. If you don't your "acceptance" just becomes a mental label that allows your ego to continue to indulge in unhappiness and so strengthen its sense of separation from other people your surroundings your here and now. As you know separation is the basis for the ego's sense of identity. True acceptance would transmute those feelings at once. And if you really knew deeply that everything is "okay as you put it and which of course is true then would you have those negative feelings in the first place? Without judgment without resistance to what is they would not arise. You have an idea in your mind that everything is okay but deep down you don't really believe it and so the old mental-emotional patterns of resistance are still in place. That's what makes you feel bad.

That's okay too.

Are you defending your right to be unconscious your right to suffer? Don't worry: nobody is going to take that away from you. Once you realize that a certain kind of food makes you sick would you carry on eating that food and keep asserting that it is okay to be sick?

Wherever You Are Be There Totally

Clairvoyance South London

From this follows a very curious result. The ray of light by which we see the sun can obviously report to us only the state of affairs which existed in that luminary when it started on its journey and would not be in the least affected by anything that happened there after it left; so that we really see the sun not as he is but as he was eight minutes ago. That is to say that if anything important took place in the sun - the formation of a new sunspot for instance - an astronomer who was watching the orb through his telescope at the time would be quite unaware of the incident while it was happening since the ray of light bearing the news would not reach him until more than eight minutes later. [Page 101]

The difference is more striking when we consider the fixed stars because in their case the distances are so enormously greater. The pole star for example is so far off that light traveling at the inconceivable speed above mentioned takes a little more than fifty years to reach our eyes; and from that follows the strange but inevitable inference that we see the pole star no as and where it is at this moment but as and where it was fifty years ago. Nay if tomorrow some cosmic catastrophe were to shatter the pole star into fragments we should still see it peacefully shining in the sky all the rest of our lives; our children would grow up to middle age and gather their children about them in turn before the news of that tremendous accident reached any terrestrial eye. In the same way there are other stars so far distant that light takes thousands of years to travel from them to us and with reference to their condition our information is therefore thousands of years behind time.

Now carry the argument a step farther. Suppose that we were able to place a man at the distance of 186 000 miles form the earth and yet to endow him with the wonderful faculty of being able from that distance to see what was happening here as clearly as though he were still close beside us. It is evident that a man so placed would see everything a second later after the time when it really happened and so at the present moment he would be seeing what happened a second ago. Double the distance and he would be two seconds behind time and so on; remove him to the [Page 102] distance of the sun (still allowing him to preserve the same mysterious power of sight) and he would look down and watch you doing not what you are doing now but what you were doing eight minutes and a quarter ago. Carry him away to the pole star and he would see passing before his eyes the events of fifty years ago; he would be watching the childish gambols of those who at the very same moment were really middle-aged men. Marvelous as this may sound it is literally and scientifically true and cannot be denied.

The little book went on to argue logically enough that God being almighty must possess the wonderful power of sight which we have been postulating for our observed; and further that being omnipresent He must be at each of the stations which we mentioned and also at every intermediate point not successively but simultaneously. Granting these premises the inevitable deduction follows that everything which has ever happened from the very beginning of the world must be at this very moment taking place before the eye of God - not a mere memory of it but the actual occurrence itself being under His observation.

All this is materialistic enough and on the plane of purely physical science and we may therefore be assured that it is not the way in which the memory of the Logos acts; yet it is neatly worked out and absolutely incontrovertible and as I have said before it is not without its use since it gives us a glimpse of some possibilities which otherwise might not occur to us. [Page 103]

But it may be asked how is it possible amid the bewildering confusion of these records of the past to find any particular picture when it is wanted? As a matter of fact the untrained clairvoyant usually cannot do so without some special link to put him en rapport with the subject required. Psychometry is an instance in point and it is quite probable that our ordinary memory is really only another presentment of the same idea. It seems as though there were a sort of magnetic attachment or affinity between any particle of matter and the record which contains its history - an affinity which enables it to act as a kind of conductor between that record and the faculties of anyone who can read it.

For example I once brought from Stonehenge a tiny fragment of stone not larger than a pin's head and on putting this into an envelope and handing it to a psychometer who had no idea what it was she at once began to describe that wonderful ruin and the desolate country surrounding it and then went on to picture vividly what were evidently scenes from its early history showing that that infinitesimal fragment had been sufficient to put her into communication with the records connected with the spot from which it came. The scenes through which we pass in the course of our life seem to act in the same manner upon the cells of our brain as did the history of Stonehenge upon that particle of stone; they establish a connection with those cells by means of which our mind is put en rapport with that particular portion of the records and so we "remember" what we have seen. [Page 104]

Clairvoyance South London

62

Abbey Wood - Acorn Walk - Bexley - Bromley - Croydon - Dulwich - East Dulwich - Greenwich - Kingston - Lambeth - Lee - Lewisham - Merton - New Cross - Peckham - Plumstead - Plumstead Common - Reculver Road - Richmond Upon Thames - Royal Hill - Southwark - Surrey Quays - Sutton - Telegraph Hill - Wandsworth -

Clairvoyance Birmingham  Clairvoyance Bristol  Clairvoyance Edinburgh  Clairvoyance Glasgow  Clairvoyance Leeds  Clairvoyance Liverpool  Clairvoyance London  Clairvoyance Manchester  Clairvoyance Sheffield

Readings with Angels